Economics and Management

Soil Acidity and its Management Options in Ethiopia: A Review

Aboytu Sisay Golla,
Article Date Published : 1 November 2019 | Page No.: EM-2019-1429-1440 | Google Scholar

Abstract

Soil acidity is one of the chemical soil degradation problems which affect soil productivity in the Ethiopian highlands. This paper tries to put together soil acidity concept, causes, extent and management practices. Soil acidity is the problem of agricultural activities in Ethiopian highlands (cultivated lands) and is getting an increase. Farmers require simple and sustainable techniques to amend acid soils and improve yields of crops of their choices. Recommendations on reclamation of acid soils need to change with new developments, such as liming, use of acid-tolerant crop varieties, integrated soil fertility management, and using of organic fertilizers. Liming has played an important role in raising soil pH and enhancing crop productivity. In Ethiopia, the gap between potential and actual yield is very wide because of soil acidity and associated nutrient availability. Acidic soils are not responsive to the application of inorganic fertilizers without amendments-it is simply wastage of resources. Thus, developing effective and efficient acid soil management practices is indispensable for enhancing crop productivity and thereby sustaining yield gains. This review focuses on the causes and managements of soil acidity and its subsequent effect on soil fertility and crop yield. It also provides important information on management options to amend soil acidity and improve the entire fertility of soils, and other organic amendments that can be applied to remedy soil acidity to the desired pH level and improve soil quality. Integrated acid soil management enhances the stability of yields and maximizes nutrient use efficiency.

Keywords: Acidity, Lime, Management

Introduction

1.1 Background of the study

Soil acidity is a critical issue requiring urgent attention in most highlands of Ethiopia because of its impact on crop production and productivity (Tessema et al., 2012; Wassie and Shiferaw, 2009; Melese and Yli-Halla, 2016). Most acidic soils have poor chemical and biological properties. Its acidity associated with Al, H, Fe, Mn toxicities to plant roots in the soil solutions and corresponding deficiencies of the available P, Mo, Ca, Mg and K (Kisinyo et al., 2014).

In the humid tropics, soils become acidic naturally due to leaching of basic cations under high rainfall conditions. At pH below 5, Al is easily soluble in water and becomes the dominant ion in the soil solution. Soil acidity is expanding in scope and magnitude in Ethiopia, severely limiting crop production. For example, in barley, wheat and faba bean growing areas of central and southern Ethiopian highlands, farmers have shifted to producing oats which is more tolerant to soil acidity than wheat and barley (Haile and Boke, 2009).

Several practices have been recommended to reclaim soil acidity and upgrade the productivity of strongly acidic soils. These include the cultivation of acid tolerant plants, covering the surface with non-acidic soil, the use of organic fertilizers, and liming. Of these practices, liming and the application of organic fertilizers are considered being the best measures, because their effects are more persistent (Chen et al., 2001). However, the unaffordability of fertilizers and lime, and unsustainable crop production calls for use of locally available low-cost organic sources through manures, green manures, and mineral fertilizers in a harmonized combination for sustainable production and soil quality. Farming in the highlands of Ethiopia is characterized by low agricultural productivity as compared with developed countries for progressive soil fertility decline over the years, and inadequate applications of amendments. The overall objective of the this paper is to see soil acidity status and what management practices are taking place to reduce the impact on soil fertility which can be one factor of agricultural productivity.

Methodology

2.1. Research questions

1. What are the cause of soil acidity in Ethiopia?

2. What are the management options to increase agricultural productivity in Ethiopia?

A literature search was conducted through the Web of Science (apps. web of knowledge.com), Google Scholar (scholar.google.com), AGRIS (agris.fao.org) Research Gate (https://www.researchgate.net), the Ethiopian Society of Soil Science (www.esss.org.et), and libraries of the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) and National Soils Research Center. From, starting 2000 to date published articles were used to write this review at dusk level. Publications in hard copies (research reports, articles in journals, chapter in books, proceedings and thesis were got from different institutions were also used. Focused on those reporting empirical results on soil acidity and its management publications were used to develop this review paper.

Extent of Soil Acidity

Soil acidity is among the major land degradation problem worldwide. About 30% of the ice-free soils (close to 4 billion ha) in the world are acidic (Sumner and Noble, 2003). Tropical and sub-tropical regions as well as areas with moderate climatic conditions are mostly affected by soil acidity. Worldwide, 32% of all arable land is acidic. Almost two-third of all acidic soils in the world belongs to Ultisols, Entisols and Oxisols (Rengel, 2011). Oxisols (also referred to Ferralsols) occupy about 3.75 million km2 or 14.3% of the total land area of Africa. The Oxisols (dusk red Latosols, dark red Latosols, red yellow Latosols, and yellow Latosols) are the dominant soils, with about 98 million ha. They are very weathered deep, acid soils, with a low availability of nutrients, but with good physical properties due to the predominance of 1:1 clay minerals, and Fe and Al oxides in the fraction (de Sant-Anna et al., 2017).

Land degradation is a critical challenge, substantially affecting agricultural productivity and rural livelihoods in Ethiopia (Yirga and Hassan, 2010), especially serious in the highlands, which is 44% of the total area of the country where human and livestock pressure is high (Amede et al., 2001). It is home to 90% of the total human population; 95% of the land under crops and 75% of livestock are also located in this area (Amede et al., 2001). The impact of land degradation has put at risk the livelihoods, economic wellbeing, and nutritional status of several people in the country (Tadesse, 2001). Land degradation not only reduces the productive capacity of agricultural land, rangelands and forest resources but also considerably impacts on biodiversity (Akhtar et al., 2011). It adversely affects the ecological integrity and productivity of large areas of land, or landscapes under human use. Soil acidity and associated low nutrient availability are key constraints to crop production in acidic soils, mainly Nitisols of Ethiopian highlands (Zeleke et al., 2010). Haile et al. (2017) estimated that ~43% of the Ethiopian cultivated land is affected by soil acidity). The extent of soil acidity in Ethiopia is about 28%, of these soils are dominated by strong acid soils (4.1-5.5 pH) (ATA, 2014).

Major Acid Soils in Ethiopia

Nitosol/Oxisol soils are the main soil classes dominated by soil acidity. Under acidic soil conditions there has been a gradual depletion of soil bases (such as Ca, Mg and K) and soil acidity developed. Soil acidity mainly at soil pH < 5.5 affects the growth of crops due to high concentration of aluminum (Al) and manganese (Mn), and deficiency of P, nitrogen (N), sulfur (S) and other nutrients (Abreha, 2013).

The dominant soil associations are Dystric Nitisols and Orthic Acrisols with inclusions of Dystric Cambisols and Lithosols on the steepest slopes. Eutric Nitisol is the dominant soil type as Nitisol in the central highlands of Ethiopia where soil acidity is the problem. Nitisol is the major soil unit that covers the western part of Ethiopia. The soil develops on a wide range of parent materials, such as volcanic, metamorphic, granitic, and felsic materials, sandstones and limestone. The soil occurs on the gently sloping to steep land, on flat and undulating lands, usually with other types of soil units such as Gleysols or Vertisols. On the other hand, the [steeper slops are usually covered with shallow soils such as Cambisols and Luvisols (Abebe, 2007).

Nitisols have very good potential for agriculture; they have a stable structure and a high-water storage capacity. Workability on these soils does not create any problem even shortly after precipitation or in the dry season, land can be prepared without difficulty. These soils have a rather low CEC for their clay content and available P are usually very low (Abebe, 2007). Nitisols have three sub-soil units, i.e. Eutric, Dystric and Humic Nitisols. Dystric Nitisol contains relatively high organic matter content in the top layer and high base saturation in the soil profile, especially in the A and B-horizons, indicating the high fertility status of the soil. Eutric Nitisol has red to dusky red lower laying horizon, with similar fertility status to that of the Dystric Nitisol. Nitisols are found in areas where the slope is between 2-16% on undulating plains, low plateaus, gentle hills and mountains side slopes of all areas. The problem of acidity is closely related to these soil types due to their geographical location, intensive cultivation, and inappropriate farm management practices (Abebe, 2007). Acrisols are generally developed from acidic parent material, which occur in the high rainfall areas associated with Nitisols and Cambisols. These soils are found on moderate to steep slopes. They are moderately suited for agriculture, partly they are cultivated, and partly they are left under natural vegetation for grazing purposes. Base saturation is generally low, and pH value is generally below neutrality. Acrisols are the results of strong weathering and depletion of bases by leaching.

Causes of Soil Acidity

Soil acidification is a multipart set of process resulting in the formation of an acid soil. In the broadest sense, it can be considered as the summation of natural and anthropogenic processes that lower down the pH of soil solution (Brady and Weil, 2008).

Removal of agricultural by products (crop residues) and continuous crop harvest (without proper fertilization), removal of cations (Wang et al., 2006) and continues use of acid forming inorganic fertilizers make important contribution to soil acidity development in most highland areas of Ethiopia. Continuous application of chemical fertilizers with N and/or P nutrients only in the form of DAP and urea, in the country, has adversely affected soil physical properties such as soil structure and bulk density (Brady and Weil, 2008). Besides, the practice can aggravate soil acidification and depletion of macro and micro plant nutrients to amounts below critical level needed for optimal crop growth and production (Marschner and Rengal, 2007; Sposito, 2008; Fageriaet al., 2011). Thus, in Ethiopia, acidity related soil fertility problems are major production constraints reducing the productivity of the major crops grown in the country (IFPRI, 2010). In efficient use of nitrogen is one of the causes of soil acidification, followed by the export of alkalinity in produce (Guo et al., 2010). Ammonium based fertilizers are major contributors to soil acidification. Ammonium nitrogen is readily converted to nitrate and hydrogen ions added in to the soil. It has been recognized that there are several causes for soils to become acidic. The following factors are the major causes of soil acidity.

a) Climate

It has been well known that in soils of dry region a large supply of bases is usually present, since little water passes through the soil. With an increase in rainfall, the contents of soluble salts are reduced to a low level, and any calcium carbonate and gypsum present are removed. With further increase in rainfall, a point is reached at which the rate of removal of bases exceeds the rate of their liberation from nonexchangeable forms. Wet climates have a greater potential for acidic soils (Tadesse, 2001). Over time, excessive rainfall leaches the soil profile’s basic elements (Ca, Mg, Na, and K) that prevent soil acidity. High rainfall leaches soluble nutrients such as Ca and Mg which are specifically replaced by Al from the exchange sites (Brady and Weil, 2016).

  1. Acidic parent material

Rocks containing an excess of quartz or silica as compared to their content of basic materials or basic elements are categorized as acid rocks; for example, granite and rhyolite. When rocks that are deficient in bases are disintegrated or decomposed in the process of the accumulation of soil material is acidic, despite no loss of base during the process of soil formation. Soils that develop from weathered granite are likely to be more acidic than those developed from shale or limestone. There are large areas of siliceous and sandy soils produced from acid parent rocks, which have always been in need of lime. However, most acid soils have been developed as a result of leaching losses and crop removal of bases (Brady and Weil, 2016).

The inherent fertility of Ethiopian soils developed under varied parent materials and climate varies depending on the origin and composition of the materials. For instance, soils developed from sandstones are poor sandy soils, whereas the inherent soil fertility developed over basic parent materials is relatively high. In alluvium plains, alluvium becomes rich and fertile if it originates from relatively young materials, and less fertile if it originates from highly weathered surfaces. The pH values in the majority of soils are in the range of 4.5 to 6.5. In most cases, soils found in high altitude areas of the country are acidic in reaction, poor in exchangeable cations and low in base saturation (Regassa and Agegnehu, 2011).

c) Application of ammonium fertilizers

Continuous application of inorganic fertilizer without soil test and amendment, in the end increase soil acidity. The use of N fertilizers in form of ammonia is a source of acidification (Fageria and Nascente, 2014; Guo et al., 2010). When ammonium fertilizers are applied to the soil, acidity is produced, but the form of N removed by the crop is similar to that found in fertilizer. Hydrogen is added in the form of ammonia-based fertilizers (NH4), urea-based fertilizers [(CO (NH2)2], and as proteins (amino acid) in organic fertilizers. Transformation of such sources of N fertilizers into nitrate (NO3) releases hydrogen ions (H+) to create soil acidity. In reality, N fertilizer increases soil acidity by increasing crop yields, thereby increasing the amount of basic elements being removed by crop harvest without incorporation. Hence, application of fertilizers containing NH4 or even adding large quantities of organic matter to a soil can ultimately increase soil acidity and lower pH (Guo et al., 2010).

d) Decomposition of organic matter

The decomposition of organic matter produces H+ ions, which are responsible for acidity. The development of soil acidity from the decomposition of organic matter is insignificant in the short-term. Large quantities of carbonic acid produced by microorganisms and higher plants including through other physicochemical and biological processes are the causes of soil acidity although the effect from its dissociation is relatively small as most of it is lost to the atmosphere as CO2 (Kochian et al., 2004; Paul, 2014). Soil organic matter or humus contains reactive carboxylic, enolic and phenolic groups that behave as weak acids. During their dissociation they release H+ ions. Further, the formation of CO2 and organic acids during the decomposition also results in replacement of bases on exchange complex with H+ ions.

e) Removal of major cations through crop h arvest

Removal of elements, especially from soils with small reservoir of bases due to the harvest of high yielding crops is responsible for soil acidity. When soils are worked mechanically and crops are grown the balance is disturbed and the soils become more acid. This is the result of base cations being removed with crops and the simultaneous increase of leaching which takes place when soils are disturbed and worked (Brady and Weil, 2016; Fageria, 2009). During growth, crops absorb basic elements such as Ca, Mg, and K to satisfy their nutritional requirements. As crop yields increase, more of these lime-like nutrients are removed from the field. Compared to the leaf and stem portions of the plant, grain contains minute amounts of these basic nutrients. Therefore, harvesting high-yielding forages such as Bermuda grass and alfalfa affects soil acidity more than harvesting grain does (Fageria and Baligar, 2008; Rengel, 2011).

f ) Land use or land cover change

Changes in land use and management practices often modify most soil physical, chemical and biological properties to the extent reflected in agricultural productivity (Gebrekidan and Negassa, 2006). Previous studies indicated that soil properties deteriorate due to the conversion of native forest and range land into cultivated land (Bore and Bedadi, 2015; Lemenih et al., 2005). Such practices result in an increase in bulk density, decline in soil organic matter (SOM) content and CEC (Conant et al., 2003), which in turn reduce the fertility status of a certain soil type. In addition, change in land use associated with deforestation, continuous cultivation, overgrazing, and mineral fertilization can cause significant variations in soil properties and reduction of output Lemenih et al., 2005).

Studies have emphasized the negative effect of land use or land cover change on soil properties. For example, the study of Agoume and Birang (2009) on the impact of land use systems on some physical and chemical soil properties of an Oxisol in the humid forest zone of southern Cameroon showed that land use systems significantly affected the clay, silt and sand fractions. Sand and silt decreased with soil depth, but clay increased. Soil pH, total N, organic carbon, available P, exchangeable cations, exchangeable Al, effective cation exchange capacity and Al saturation significantly differed with the land use systems.

The Al saturation increased with soil depth, and the top soils presented acidity problems while the sub soils exhibited Al toxicity. According to Chimdi et al. (2012) indicated also a decline in total porosity in the soils of grazing and cultivated land in comparison to soils of forest land was attributed to a reduction in pore size distribution and the magnitude of SOM loss which in turn depends on the intensity of soil management practices. Bore and Bedadi (2015) also reported that the amount of SOM in grazing and cultivated lands has depleted by 42.6 and 76.5%, respectively, compared to the forest soil.

g) Low buffer capacity of the soil

Another source of soil acidity is contact exchange between exchangeable hydrogen on root surfaces and the bases in exchangeable form on soils. Where leaching is limited, microbial production of nitric and sulfuric acids also occurs. The lime requirement of acid soil is related not only to the soil pH but also to the buffer or CEC. The buffering or CEC is related to the amount of clay and organic matter present, the larger the amount, the greater the buffer capacity. Soils with higher buffer capacity (clayey, peats), if acid, have high lime requirement. Coarse textured soils with little or no organic matter will have low buffer capacity and, even if acid, will have low lime requirement. The indiscriminate use of lime on coarse textured soil could lead to over-liming injury. Therefore, the relationship between pH and percent base saturation is important for soils representative of 1:1 and 2:1 clays, because a much higher base saturation was required to raise the pH to 6 with montmorillonite than with kaolinite. For instance, soils with 2:1 clays (fine, mixed, and thermic Vertic (Hapludults) had to be 80% base saturated to give the same pH as the soils with 1:1 clays (fine, loamy, siliceous thermic Typic Hapludult) at 40% base saturation as determined by the sum of cations, pH 8.2 CEC method (Kamprath and Adams,2010).

Effect of Soil Acidity on Nutrient Availability and Crop Yield

The detrimental effect of soil acidity on plant growth and yield is mainly attributed to the deficiency of phosphorus, which is caused by adsorption of P to colloidal fractions and conversion to insoluble Al and/or Fe compounds and toxicity of aluminum, iron and manganese (Sumner, 2000; Hocking, 2001; Brady and Weil, 2008). Deficiencies of calcium, magnesium, potassium and molybdenum have also been reported to limit crop yield in acid soils (Sumner, 2000).

The solubility and availability of important nutrients to plants is closely related to the pH of the soil (Marschner, 2011). Soil pH affects the availability of plant nutrients. Effects of high acidity in a soil are shortage of available Ca, P and Mo on the one hand, and excess of soluble Al, Mn and other metallic ions on the other (Agegnehu and Sommer, 2000a). Acid soil limits the availability of crucial nutrients such as P, K, Ca and Mg, and affects the movement of soil organisms plants need to stay healthy. If a particular soil is too acidic for plants to grow healthy, it is necessary to raise the pH by applying an alkaline substance.

Soil acidity and associated low nutrient availability is one of the constraints to crop production on acid soils. If a pH of a soil is less than 5.5 phosphate can readily be rendered unavailable to plant roots as it is the most immobile of the major plant nutrients (Agegnehu and Sommer, 2000b), and yields of crops grown in such soils are very low. In soil pH between 5.5 and 7, P fixation is low and its availability to plants is higher. Toxicity and deficiency of Fe and Mn may be avoided if the soil reaction is held within a soil pH range of 5.5 to 7; this pH range seems to promote the most ready availability of plant nutrients. The quantity of P in soil solution needed for optimum growth of crops lies in the range of 0.13 to 1.31 kg P ha-1 as growing crops absorb about 0.44 kg P ha-1 per day (Lawlor, 2004). The labile fraction in the topsoil layer is in the range of 65 to 218 kg P ha-1, which could replenish soil solution P (Lawlor, 2004).

Soil Acidity Management

The management of acid soils should aim at improving the production potential by the addition amendments to correct the acidity and manipulate the agricultural practices to obtain optimum crop yields. The soil’s acid/alkali balance (measured by pH) of the soil is very important in maintaining optimum availability of soil nutrients and minimizing potential toxicities. For example, at a very low pH Al may become more soluble and can be taken up by roots - becoming toxic, P may become unavailable and Ca levels can be low. At high pH, Fe and other micronutrients (except Mo) are rendered unavailable since they are locked up as insoluble hydroxides and carbonates (Slattery and Hollier, 2002).

a) Liming

Liming is the application of calcium- and magnesium-rich materials to soil in various forms, including marl, chalk, limestone, or hydrated lime. It is a desirable practice where soil is highly acidic and multi-cropping involving acid sensitive crops is adopted. Lime, in its most pure form, is made up largely of Ca. Calcium carbonate is a base, and therefore, has a neutralizing effect on acid (Edmeades et al., 2003). Lime improves base saturation and availability of Ca and Mg. Fixation of P and Mo is reduced by inactivating the reactive constituents. Toxicity arising from excess soluble Al, Fe and Mn is corrected and thereby root growth is promoted and uptake of nutrients is improved. Liming also stimulates microbial activity and enhances N fixation and N mineralization and hence, legumes are highly benefited from liming (Fageria and Baligar, 2008; Pilbeam and Morley, 2007). However, over-liming can considerably reduce the bioavailability of micronutrients, such as Zn, Cu, Fe, Mn and B, which decreases with increasing pH (Fageria and Baligar, 2008). This can produce plant nutrient deficiencies, particularly that of Fe.

Soil acidity limits or reduces crop productivity mainly by impairing root growth thereby reducing nutrient and water uptake (Marschner, 2011). Soil acidity converts available soil nutrients into unavailable forms and soils affected by soil acidity are poor in their basic cations, such as Ca, K, Mg, and some micronutrients, which are essential to crop growth and development (Wang et al., 2006). The extent of damage posed by soil acidity varies from place to place depending on several factors, and there are occasions where total crop failure occurs due to soil acidity. Thus, the main effects of liming are increasing the available P through inactivation or precipitation of exchangeable and soluble Al and Fe hydroxides, increase in pH, available P, exchangeable cations and percent base saturation, and enhancing the growth density and length of root hairs for uptake of P (Marschner, 2011).

Soil acidity can be corrected easily by liming the soil, or adding basic materials to neutralize the acid present. The most economical liming materials and relatively easy to manage are calcitic or dolomitic agricultural limestone. Since these products are natural they are relatively insoluble in water, agricultural limestone must be very finely ground so it can be thoroughly mixed with the soil and allowed to react with soil’s acidity. Calcitic limestone is mostly calcium carbonate (CaCO3). Dolomitic limestone is made from rocks containing a mixture of Ca and Mg carbonates (CaCO3 + MgCO3). Other liming materials which are less frequently used include burned lime (CaO), hydrated lime [Ca(OH)2] and wood ashes (Pilbeam and Morley, 2007; Rengel, 2011).

According to Agegnehu et al. (2006) the application of lime at the rates of 1, 3 and 5 t ha-1 resulted significantly in linear response with mean faba bean seed yield advantages of 45, 77 and 81% over the control. Desalegn et al. (2017) showed that application of 0.55, 1.1, 1.65 and 2.2 t lime ha-1 decreased Al3+by 0.88, 1.11, 1.20 and 1.19 mill equivalents per 100 g of soil, and increased soil pH by 0.48, 0.71, 0.85 and 1.1 units, respectively. Agegnehu et al. (2006) also indicated that soil pH consistently increased from 4.37 to 5.91 as lime rate increased. Conversely, the exchangeable acidity was significantly reduced from 1.32 to 0.12 cmol (+) kg-1 because of lime application. Yield increments showed direct relationship with the soil pH values and inverse relationship with exchangeable acidity, i.e. as the pH increased the yield also increased, but as the exchangeable acidity decreased the yield of faba bean increased and vice versa. There is also found that seed yields of legumes were optimal between soil pH values of 5.7 and 7.2 and yields of pea could be increased by 30% due to lime application to soils with pH values less than 5.4.

Figure 1:

Figure 1. The growth of faba bean under limed condition on acidic soils Welmera Woreda ,Ethiopia Source: Agegnehu et al. (2006)

Figure 2:

Figure 2. The growth of faba bean under un-limed condition on acidic soils Welmera Woreda,Ethiopia, Source: Agegnehu et al. (2006)

b) Complimentary management strategies / using acid tolerant crop varieties

If soil pH is low, using tolerant species/varieties of crops and pasture can reduce the impact of soil acidity. This is not a permanent solution because the soil will continue to acidify without liming treatment. A number of management practices can reduce the rate of soil acidification. Management of nitrogen fertilizer application is the most important practice to reduce nitrate leaching in high rainfall areas. Product export can be reduced by feeding hay back onto paddocks from where it has been cut. Less acidifying options in crop rotations will also help, e.g. replace legume hay with a less acidifying crop or pasture (Bolland et al., 2004).

The number of plant species of economic importance are generally regarded as tolerant to acid soil conditions. Many of them have their center of origin in acid soil regions, suggesting that adaptation to soil constraints is part of the evolutionary process. Although the species as a whole does not tolerate, some varieties of certain species also possess acid soil tolerance. Quantitative assessments of plant tolerance to acid soil stresses include tolerance to high levels of Al or Mn, and to deficiencies of Ca, Mg, P, etc. Species and genotypes within a species have been reported to have considerable variation in their tolerance to Al and Mn. The selection of varieties or species that perform well at high Al saturation levels and thus need only a fraction of the normal lime requirement is of great practical importance. In the highlands of Ethiopia, barley is mainly grown on Nitisols, where soil pH is low. This means that barley has been already adapted to acid soil conditions. With this understanding five released barley varieties were evaluated under limed and unlimed condition on acidic soils at Endibir. Barley varieties (HB-42 and Dimtu) performed well under limed condition, i.e. yield increments of 366 and 327%, respectively over the corresponding yields of the same barley varieties under unlimed condition were recorded. In contrast, barley varieties (HB-1307 and Ardu) performed better under unlimed condition, i.e. lower yields of 48 and 49% compared to the corresponding yields of the same barley varieties achieved under limed condition (Kochian et al., 2004).

c) Addition of Organic Fertilizers to Acidic Soils

Farmyard manure (FYM) and crop residues are among organic plant nutrient sources, which could ameliorate the physical and chemical properties of soils. For example, Lal (2009) indicated that returning crop residues to soil as amendments is essential for recycling plant nutrients (20–60 kg of N, P, K, Ca per Mg of crop residues) amounting to 118 million Mg of N, P, K in residues produced annually in the world (83.5% of world’s fertilizer consumption). In acid soils, where P fixation is a problem application of FYM releases a range of organic acids that can form stable complexes with Al and Fe thereby blocking the P retention sites, and as a result, the availability and use efficiency of P is improved (Agegnehu and Amede, 2017). The positive effects of manure on crop yields have been explained on the basis of cation exchange between root surfaces and soil colloids (Walker et al., 2004).

The addition of organic fertilizers to acid soils has been effective in reducing phytotoxic levels of Al resulting in yield increases. The major mechanisms responsible for these improvements are thought to be the formation of organo-Al complexes that render the Al less toxic or direct neutralization of Al from the increase in pH caused by the organic matter. The possible alternative of using organic sources such as crop residues, manures, compost and biochar are substitutes for lime (Agegnehu and Amede, 2017). The authors demonstrated that organic sources raises pH and precipitate Al in direct proportion to its basic cation or ash alkalinity with a correction for the acidity produced during the oxidation of the N in the material. For instance, Cornelissen et al. (2018) found that cacao shell biochar exhibited a higher pH(9.8 vs. 8.4), CEC (197 vs. 20 cmol kg-1) and acid neutralizing capacity (217 vs. 45 cmol kg-1) and thus had a greater liming potential than rice husk biochar. Haile and Boke (2009) also reported that the combined application of NP fertilizer and FYM on acid soil of Chencha, southern Ethiopia significantly increased potato tuber yield and some soil chemical properties relative to application of NP alone.

In tropical regions, crop yields generally decrease with time, partly due to a decline in the levels of exchangeable bases linked to acidification of the upper layers of the soil. The management of acid soils through integrated soil fertility and plant nutrient management not only improve the yields of crops but also the chemical properties of soils. Regular applications of organic residues can induce a long-term increase in SOM and nutrient content. According to Haynes and Mokolobate (2001), complexation of Al by the newly formed organic matter tends to reduce the concentrations of exchangeable and soluble Al. As organic residues decompose, P is released and can be adsorbed to oxide surfaces. This can reduce the extent of adsorption of subsequently added P thus increasing P availability. The practical implication of these processes is that organic residues may be used as a strategic tool to reduce the rates of lime and fertilizer P required for optimum crop production on acidic, P-fixing soils. Agegnehu and Bekele (2005b) found that the application of 4 and 8 t FYM ha-1 with 26 kg P ha-1 on acid Nitisols of Holetta, Ethiopia, increased faba bean seed yield by 97 and 104%, respectively, compared to the control. The same rates increased soil pH from 4.5-5.0, N from 0.09-0.15%, P from 4.2-6.0 mg kg-1, and K, Ca and Mg from 1.25-1.45, 4.77-7.29 and 0.83-1.69 cmol (+) kg-1, respectively.

Conclusion

Sustainable soil management practices and the maintenance of soil quality are central issues to agricultural sustainability. Soil acidity problems are increasing in the highland areas of Ethiopia. Soil acidity and associated low nutrient availability are among the major constraints to crop production. Soil reaction is one of the physiological characteristics of the soil solution expressed in terms of pH which indicates whether the soil is acid, alkaline, or neutral. It exercises significant on many soil properties including nutrient availability, biological activity, and soil physical condition.

The practice of liming acid soils to mitigate soil acidity and reduce phytotoxic levels of Al and Mn has been recognized as necessary for optimal crop production in acid soils. However, application of lime should be considered as an approach to improve soil pH to optimize nutrient availability for optimum plant growth and yield, otherwise, it is not an end goal by itself to achieve potential yield. Liming should be coupled with the applications of optimum rates of inorganic and organic fertilizers, particularly P and K fertilizers. Moreover, there is a need for identifying areas where lime application brings significant change and benefit in crop yield. Overall, liming should be considered as a soil amendment to raise soil pH to the level that is suitable for maximum nutrient availability, plant growth, and crop yield.

In general, the integrated use of all the available resources including acid tolerant crops and crop species, which improve and sustain soil and agricultural productivity, is of great practical significance. Overall, acid soil management needs to emphasize strategic research, integrating soil and water management with improved crop varieties to generate prototype and environmentally benign technologies for sustained food production within a framework of appropriate socio-economic and policy considerations. Lime and inorganic phosphate fertilizers are used to remedy these problems. However, due to increasing costs and unavailability when needed, their use among our farmers in our country is not widespread. Thus the government should give an attention to the supply of lime where it is prudently needed.

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge all researchers who contributed for soil acid management to fetch a solution to minimize its adverse impact and foster its contribution to the country’s food security and the author also acknowledges Mr. Dagne Mequannet and Mr. Amare Alemnew for their comments and suggestions during preparation of this manuscript.

References

  1. Abebe, M. (2007). “Nature and management of acid soils in Ethiopia,” Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.

  2. Abreha Kidanemariam, Heluf Gebrekidan, Tekalign Mamo, KindieTesfaye, 2013. Wheat Crop Response to Liming Materials and N and P Fertilizers in Acidic Soils of Tsegede Highlands, Northern Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries .Vol. 2, No. 3, 126 -135.

  3. Agegnehu, G., and Amede, T. (2017). Integrated soil fertility and plant nutrient management in tropical agro-ecosystems: A review. Pedosphere 27, 662-680.

  4. Agegnehu, G., and Bekele, T. (2005b). Phosphorus ferilizer and farmyard manure effects on the growth and yield of Faba Bean and some soil chemical properties in acidic nitisols of the central highlands of Ethiopia. Ethiop. J. Nat. Resources. 7, 23-39.

  5. Agegnehu, G., Fikre, A., and Tadesse, A. (2006). Cropping Systems, Soil Fertility and Crop Management Research on Food Legumes in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. In “A Review of Major Achievements of a Decade” (K. Ali, G. Keneni, S. Ahmed, R. S. Malhotra, S. Beniwal and K. Makkouk, eds.), pp. 135- 145. ICARDA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

  6. Agegnehu, G., and Sommer, K. (2000a). Optimization of the efficiency of phosphate fertilizers in acidicferralitic soils of the humid tropics. Ethiopian Journal of Natural Resources 2, 63-77.

  7. Agegnehu, G., and Sommer, K. (2000b). Optimization of the efficiency of phosphate fertilizers in acidicferralitic soils of the humid tropics. Ethiop. J. Nat. Resources 2, 63-77.

  8. Agoume, V., and Birang, A. (2009). Impact of land-use systems on some physical and chemical soil properties of an oxisol in the humid forest zone of southern Cameroon. Tropicultura 27, 15-20.

  9. Akhtar Schuster, M., Thomas, R. J., Stringer, L. C., Chasek, P., and Seely, M. (2011). Improving the enabling environment to combat land degradation: Institutional, financial, legal and science‐policy challenges and solutions. Land Degradation and Development 22, 299-312.

  10. Amede, T., Belachew, T., and Geta, E. (2001). Reversing the degradation of arable land in the Ethiopian highlands. In “Managing Africa’s Soils”, pp. 1-29, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

  11. Ano, A.O., Ubochi, C.I., 2007. Neutralization of soil acidity by animal manures: Mechanism of reaction. African Journal of Biotechnology 6(4): 364-368.

  12. ATA (2014). Soil Fertility Mapping and Fertilizer blending. Agricultural Transformation Agency (ATA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

  13. Bolland M, Gazey C, Miller A, Gartner D and Roche J (2004) Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia Bulletin 4602. (online)

  14. Bore, G., and Bedadi, B. (2015). Impacts of land use types on selected soil physico-chemical properties of Loma Woreda, Dawuro zone, southern Ethiopia. Sci. Technol. Arts Res. J. 4, 40-48.

  15. Brady, N., and Weil, R. (2016). “The nature and properties of soils,” Pearson Education, Columbus, EUA.

  16. Chen, J.H., Wu, J.T., Huang, W.T., 2001. Effects of compost on the availability of nitrogen and phosphorus in strongly acidic soils. Food and Fertilizer Technology Center Extension Bulletin Vol. 155.

  17. Chimdi, A., Gebrekidan, H., Kibret, K., and Tadesse, A. (2012). Status of selected Physicochemical properties of soils under different land use systems of western Oromia, Ethiopia. J. Biodiv. Environ. Sci. 2, 57-71.

  18. Chiu, K.K., Ye, Z.H., Wong, M.H., 2006. Growth of Vetiveriazizanioidesand Phragmitiesaustralison Pb/Zn and Cu mine tailings amended with manure compost and sewage sludge: a greenhouse study. Bioresource Technology 97(1): 158-170.

  19. Conant, R. T., Smith, G. R., and Paustian, K. (2003). Spatial variability of soil carbon in forested and cultivated sites. J. Environ. Quality 32, 278-286.

  20. Crawford, T.W., Singh, J.U., Breman, H., 2008. Solving agricultural problems related to soil acidity in Central Africa’s Great Lake Region. Catalyst Project Report. An International Center for Soil Fertility and Agricultural Development. Alabama, USA. 133p.

  21. de Sant-Anna, S. A., Jantalia, C. P., Sa, J. M., Vilela, L., Marchao, R. L., Alves, B. J., Urquiaga, S., and Boddey, R. M. (2017). Changes in soil organic carbon during 22 years of pastures, cropping or integrated crop/ livestock systems in the Brazilian Cerrado. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 108, 101-120.

  22. Desalegn, T., Alemu, G., Adella, A., and Debele, T. (2017). Effect of lime and phosphorus fertilizer on Acid soils and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) performance in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Exp. Agric. 53, 432-444.

  23. Edmeades, D., Ridley, A., and Rengel, Z. (2003). Handbook of soil acidity. Handbook of soil acidity.

  24. Fageria, N.K., Baligar,V.C., 2003. Fertility management of tropical acid soils for sustainable crop production. In: Handbook of Soil Acidity. Rengel, Z. (Ed.), Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, USA. pp. 359–385.

  25. Fageria, N., and Baligar, V. (2008). Ameliorating soil acidity of tropical Oxisols by liming for sustainable crop production. Adv. Agron. 99, 345-399.

  26. Fageria, N. K. (2009). “The use of nutrients in crop plants,” CRC Press: Taylor and Francis Group, USA.

  27. Fageria, N. K., and Nascente, A. S. (2014). Management of soil acidity of South American soils for sustainable crop production. Adv. Agron. 128, 221-275.

  28. Gebrekidan, H., and Negassa, W. (2006). Inmpact of land use and management practices on chemical properties of some soils of Bako area, Western Ethiopia. Ethiop. J. Nat. Resources. 8, 177-197.

  29. Guo, J. H., Liu, X. J., Zhang, Y., Shen, J. L., Han, W. X., Zhang, W. F., Christie, P., Goulding, K. W. T.,Vitousek, P. M., and Zhang, F. S. (2010). Significant Acidification in Major Chinese Croplands. Science 327, 1008-1010.

  30. Haile, W., and Boke, S. (2011). Response of Irish potato (Solanum tuberosum) to the application of potassium at acidic soils of Chencha, Southern Ethiopia. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 13, 595-598.

  31. Haynes, R., and Mokolobate, M. (2001). Amelioration of Al toxicity and P deficiency in acid soils by additions of organic residues: a critical review of the phenomenon and the mechanisms involved. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 59, 47-63.

  32. Hocking, P.S., 2001. Organic acids exuded from roots in phosphorus uptake and aluminum tolerance of plants in acid soils. In: D.L. Sparks (ed.). Advances in Agronomy. Academic

  33. IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute). (2010). Fertilizer and soil fertility potential in Ethiopia constraints and opportunities for enhancing the system. Working Paper.

  34. Kamprath, E. J., and Adams, F. (2010). Soil acidity and liming. In “Century of soil science”, pp. 103-107. Soil Science Society of North Carolina, North Carolina, USA.

  35. Kisinyo, P.O., Opala, P.A. Gudu, S.O. Othieno, C.O. Okalebo, J.R. Palapala, V., Otinga,

  36. A.N., 2014. Recent advances towards understanding Kenyan acid soils for improved crop

  37. production. African Journal of Agricultural Research 9(31): 2397-2408.

  38. Kochian, L. V., Hoekenga, O. A., and Pineros, M. A. (2004). How do crop plants tolerate acid soils? Mechanisms of aluminum tolerance and phosphorous efficiency. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 459-493.

  39. Lal, R. (2009). Soils and food sufficiency: A review. In “Sustainable agriculture”, pp. 25-49. Springer.

  40. Lal, R. (2015). Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability 7, 5875-5895.

  41. Lawlor, D. (2004). Mengel, K. and Kirkby, EA Principles of plant nutrition. Oxford University Press.

  42. Lemenih, M., Karltun, E., and Olsson, M. (2005). Assessing soil chemical and physical property responses to deforestation and subsequent cultivation in smallholders farming system in Ethiopia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 105, 373-386.

  43. Martínez-Blanco, J., Cristina, L., Christensen, T.H., Muñoz, P., Rieradevall, J., Møller, J., Antón, A., Boldrin, A., (2013). Compost benefits for agriculture evaluated by life cycle assessment. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 33(4): 721-732.

  44. Marschner, H. (2011). “Marschners mineral nutrition of higher plants,” Academic press, London.

  45. Melese, A., Yli-Halla, M., (2016). Effects of applications of lime, wood ash, manure and mineral P fertilizer on the inorganic P fractions and other selected soil chemical properties on acid soil of Farta District, northwestern highland of Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research 11(2): 87-99.

  46. Mokolobate, M.S., Haynes, R.J., (2002). Comparative liming effect of four organic residues applied to an acid soil. Biology and Fertility of Soil 35(2): 79-85.

  47. Opala, P. A., Odendo, M., and Muyekho, F. N. (2018). Effects of lime and fertilizer on soil properties and maize yields in acid soils of Western Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural Research 13, 657-663.

  48. Osundwa, M.A., Okalebo, J.R., Ngetich, W.K., Ochuodho, J.O., Othieno, C.O., Langat, B. and Omenyo, V.S. (2013). Influence of agricultural lime on soil properties and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield on acidic soils of Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 3(4): 806-823.

  49. Pilbeam, D. J., and Morley, P. S. (2007). Calcium. Hand book of plant nutrition. In: Barker, A.V., Pilbeam, D.J. (eds.). CRC: Taylor and Francis, New York, pp. 121-144.

  50. Regassa, H., and Agegnehu, G. (2011). Potentials and limitations of acid soils in the highlands of Ethiopia: a review. In “Barley research and development in Ethiopia” (B. Mulatu and S. Grando, eds.), pp. 103- 112. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.

  51. Rengel, Z. (2011). Soil pH, soil health and climate change. In “Soil health and climate change”, pp. 69-85. Springer.

  52. Slattery B, Hollier C. (2002). The Impact of Acid Soils in Victoria. Report for the Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority, North East Catchment Management Authority. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Rutherglen Research Institute.

  53. Sposito, G., (2008). The Chemistry of Soils. 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press, New York. 330 p.

  54. Sumner, M.E., (2000). Handbook of Soil Science.CRC Press Washington, D.C. USA.

  55. Sumner, M. E., and Noble, A. D. (2003). Soil acidification: The world story. In ‘‘Handbook of Soil Acidity (Z. Rengel, Ed.), pp. 1–28. Marcel Dekker, New York.

  56. Tadesse, G. (2001). Land Degradation: A challenge to Ethiopia. Environ. Manage. 27, 815-824.

  57. Tessema, G., Argaw, M., Adgo, E., (2012). Farmers soil management practices and their Perceptions to soil acidity at Ankesha District of Awi Zone, Northwestern Ethiopia. Libyan Agriculture Research Center Journal International 3: 64-72.

  58. Valarini, P.J, Curaqueo, G., Seguel, A., Manzano, K., Rubio, R., Cornejo, P., Borie, F., (2009). Effect of compost application on some properties of a volcanic soil from central South Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 69(3): 416-425.

  59. Walker, D. J., Clemente, R., and Bernal, M. P. (2004). Contrasting effects of manure and compost on soil pH, heavy metal availability and growth of Chenopodium album L. in a soil contaminated by pyritic mine waste. Chemosphere 57, 215-224.

  60. Wang, J., Raman, H., Zhang, G., Mendham, N., and Zhou, M. (2006). Aluminum tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): physiological mechanisms, genetics and screening methods. J. Zhejiang University Sci. 7, 769-787.

  61. Wassie, H., Shiferaw, B. and Kelsa, K. (2009). Integrated soil fertility management options for Sustainable Crop Production: Review of Research Findings from Southern Regional State of Ethiopia. Paper presented on the 10th anniversary conference of Ethiopian Society of Soil Science (ESSS), 26-27 March 2009, Addis Ababa,

  62. Yirga, C., and Hassan, R. M. (2010). Social costs and incentives for optimal control of soil nutrient depletion in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Agricultural Systems 103, 153-160.

  63. Zeleke, G., Agegnehu, G., Abera, D., and Rashid, S. (2010). Fertilizer and soil fertility potential in Ethiopia: Constraints and opportunities for enhancing the system. (I. F. P. R. I. (IFPRI), ed.), pp. 63, Washington, DC, USA.

Author's Affiliation

Copyrights & License

International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 2019.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Article Details


Issue: Vol 7 No 11 (2019)
Page No.: EM-2019-1429-1440
Section: Economics and Management
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v7i11.em01

How to Cite

Sisay Golla, A. (2019). Soil Acidity and its Management Options in Ethiopia: A Review. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 7(11), EM-2019. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v7i11.em01

Download Citation

  • HTML Viewed - 58 Times
  • PDF Downloaded - 35 Times
  • XML Downloaded - 44 Times