Notaries have a very important role in legal traffic, especially in the field of civil law, because a notary is domiciled as a public official who has the authority to make other deeds and authorities. One of the authorities granted is to make a deed relating to land, as referred to in Article 15 paragraph (2) letter F of the Notary Position Act.

This research shows the authority of the notary in making land deeds in a narrow sense, namely the Power of Attorney Charges Mortgage (SKMHT) and in the broad sense namely the Roya Concert Act, the Right of Release Deed, the Declaration of inheritance rights for Indonesian citizens of the Chinese group. The power of attorney to impose liability the juridical implication is a power of attorney that cannot be withdrawn and does not end by any reason except with the making of the deed of rights to give the dependent. The deed of Roya concentration has a position as a substitute certificate of liability in the write-off of mortgage rights and has no executive power. With respect to the rights release deed, the juridical implications lead to the release of land rights from holders of ownership rights to individual land to the rights applicant, namely a private legal entity, first released to the state accompanied by compensation. Regarding the certificate of inheritance rights made by a notary for Indonesian citizens of Chinese descent the juridical implication is the basis for determining rights as heirs in the transfer of rights on the basis of inheritance.

Normative research concerning Configuring the Replacement of Regulations on the Registration of Land Rights by addressing the issue of ideology and Raison de Etre's rule of law gave the conclusion, that the Registration of Mastering Rights by the State should respect and recognize individual rights to land.

From the analysis and discussion that discusses, conclusions can be drawn, that is the Right to Mastery over the Land held by the Government agrees if it has the power to connect the economic sector. More details can be found: Registration of land rights cannot be agreed with political policies on land use. In the implementation of PP 10 of 1961 the government seized people's land rights, then redistributed the people who needed it as agricultural land (in addition, this program of land redistribution was communicated to the government as an asset with public reasons; it found different political attitudes when implement PP 24 of 1997, namely: by regulating the fundamentals of a new government-finance and vice versa with the Pancasila Philosophy as a principle of Efficiency-Justice Actually it was implemented at the beginning of Repelita I by enacting Law No. 1 of 1967 (Foreign Investment) A comparable increase is needed with the people's prosperity which is relatively difficult to achieve (PP 10 of 1961) which seeks to increase government original income (PAD).

In carrying out its duties related to the making of deeds, the Land Deed Maker Officer (PPAT) is directly in contact with tax issues because the procedure for making a deed requires payment of taxes before the deed can be signed. According to the provisions in the collection of Customs and Land Rights (BPHTB) collection fees using a self-assessment system, but in the implementation of calculations and deposits to the regional treasury it is not often entrusted by the taxpayer to PPAT. The problems discussed in this study are about the implementation of BPHTB collection in the city of Mataram and how the position of PPAT in implementing BPHTB collection. This research is empirical legal research with the consideration of obtaining a direct description of the role of PPAT in implementing BPHTB collection in the city of Mataram. The approach used is the legislative approach, conceptual approach, sociological approach. Data collection techniques by conducting studies in the field in the form of interviews, then processing data and analyzed descriptively qualitatively so that answers to existing problems are obtained. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that the implementation of BPHTB collection in Mataram City is still done conventionally, namely the taxpayer completes the Regional Tax Deposit Form - the Land Acquisition Fee (SSPD-BPHTB) and submits it manually to the Regional Finance Agency (BKD) of Mataram City to do the verification process, then the taxpayer makes a payment through the reception counter at the BKD Office in the City of Mataram. The position of PPAT in BPHTB collection is as an authorized official in fulfilling BPHTB services, the intention is that PPAT in carrying out its position as a public official authorized to make a transfer deed of land rights has the right to refuse a deed if it is not submitted proof of BPHTB payment.

The purpose of this study was to find out the procedure for land dispute resolution carried out by the Village Head, to find out the basis of authority of the Village Head in land dispute resolution efforts based on Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages and to find out the legal strength of land dispute resolution. This type of research is normative legal research. The theory used in this study is the theory of dispute resolution, the theory of authority and the theory of legal certainty. The approach method used is the legislative approach, case approach, and conceptual approach. Based on the results of the study that the procedure for land dispute resolution carried out by the Village Head was carried out in several stages, namely: 1. complaints; 2. summons of disputing parties; 3. the process of deliberation; and 4. formulating the results of the agreement in the form of a Joint Peace Letter. The authority of the Village Head in an effort to resolve land disputes is Article 26 of Law Number 6 Year 2014 concerning Villages and Law Number 30 Year 2014 concerning Government Administration. The power of land dispute resolution law carried out by the village head in the form of a Peace Letter on land disputes made by the Village Head based on what has been agreed upon by the disputing parties, it can be said that what is stated in the Peace Letter is valid and applies as a Law for those who make it, in this case the parties to the dispute. The agreements are irrevocable for reasons which are sufficient by law.

Educational frameworks and Kenyan constitutions mandate schools to adopt; design and implement programmes that support inclusive education. Despite the inclusive education policy, disability remains a major course of exclusion in public secondary schools in Kenya. The study evaluated the influence physical resources towards the implementation of inclusive education in Kenyan schools. The study employed mixed method research design which uses both qualitative and quantitative methods. Purposive sampling technique was used to select 201 respondents from 18 extra-county and county public secondary schools that had enrolled learners with physical disabilities. Quantitative data was collected using questionnaires while qualitative data was collected through interviews and focus group discussions. A t-test was used to test the significance and determine whether to reject or accept the study hypotheses. An analysis of the findings indicated significant relationships between physical resources and implementation of inclusive education. The Linear Model showed a moderate positive correlation between human resource and inclusion. The model further showed that the rate of physical resource accounted for some variation towards the implementation of inclusive education. Creating an inclusive school where physical resources are modified and restructured to respond to learner diversity is a complex process with many inter-related elements. The schools should have a collaborative approach by creating back-up partnerships with parents, the community and disability associations. There is a need mobilize all key stakeholders to modify physical resources in order to overcome barriers that hamper access and participation in the learning process