The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze the influence of responsibility, leadership anddiscipline on job performance. This research used a quantitative approach with survey method. The sampleof this research is the whole 120 teachers in High School at North Jakarta is done randomly. The results ofthe research showed that(1) there is a positive direct influence on responsibility for performance; (2) there isa positive direct effect of leadership on performance; (3) there is a positive direct influence on responsibilityfor leadership; (4) there is a positive indirect effect of responsibility for performance through leadership. Toimprove performance, it is necessary to increase responsibility, and leadership.
The performance of teachers in North Jakarta Public High Schools must always be improved to produce quality education quality. Having a teacher who performs well, will have implications for the learning process in the classroom in educating students, which in turn can improve the quality of students. Likewise, conversely, teachers who perform poorly will have an impact on the quality of students.Therefore improving teacher performance can be supported by several factors such as teachers must have responsibility in work, leadership of school principals. Based on the initial survey, it was found that there were several problems related to the performance of North Jakarta High School teachers including;
Not being able to optimally develop teaching materials properly, teaching materials only focus on teaching material books so that the teacher does not have the ability to adapt teaching materials and teaching materials according to the needs of students, not according to the conditions of students and not in accordance with work life.
Other problems that arise, teachers have not optimally designed teaching materials well, do not develop their creativity and even seem to only focus on completing teaching material. Not evaluating student learning methods, not paying attention to how to teach well related to the application of teaching approaches and methods, not understanding the ability of students to receive teaching material, and not paying attention to students' ability to understand teaching material so that mastery and understanding of teaching material for students is not optimal.
Furthermore, the lack of optimal teacher performance can also be seen from the quality of work shown by North Jakarta High School teachers. This can be seen that the teacher is often late in teaching in the classroom, often completing teaching before the time is over, even not paying attention to class conditions and the readiness of students to receive teaching materials. Even though paying attention to the readiness of students in receiving teaching material is very important to see the effectiveness of teaching in the classroom.
Furthermore, the problem that arises when researchers conduct surveys in the field is that teachers only complete their main tasks as teaching staff in the classroom, only focus on students' cognitive abilities and pay little attention to aspects of student character so that some students are still involved in brawls between students.
The teacher has not yet carried out a self evaluation of his performance so that every year the method of teaching, the method used, and the approach applied are always the same from year to year so that it has implications for students' ability to receive teaching material. Still assuming that the main goal of the teacher is only teaching in the classroom, completing teaching material in the classroom is a necessity so that it does not pay attention to other aspects that can affect the quality of learning. This is the reason why the learning process in the classroom seems monotonous and uninteresting.
Basically performance is the level of achievement of the implementation of teacher duties based on their authority and responsibility. To achieve good performance is certainly not an easy thing. This is due to the number of things or aspects that affect the level of performance of a teacher, both in terms of organizational mechanisms, group mechanisms, individual characteristics, and individual mechanisms. According to Sony and Mekoth (2016)
While Melanie Ohme and Zacher (2015)
According to Colquitt (2011)
According to Ghani, et.al, (2016
Performance is the activity of the teacher directed at the implementation of organizational tasks caused to him. The direction of behavior is carried out through work references in the form of work objectives. This can take the form of regulations, descriptions of basic tasks and work functions, and direction and authority of the organization. thus achieving goals through various directives is the expectation of the teacher's level of achievement.
Based on some of the above concepts can be synthesized performance is the total value expected to individuals in carrying out a work based on the targets and criteria that have been set with indicators (1) the results of effective and efficient work, (2) have quality and quantity in work, (3) achievement of achievement of work objectives, (4) ability to do work, (5) increase the academic value of students, and (6) achieve organizational goals.
Responsibility is another term of responsibility. Responsibility is an action that is very important to do in everyday life because without responsibility, then everything will be chaotic. However responsibility becomes something very important in his main life in the world of education. According to Mergler and Shield (2016)
Meanwhile according to Robbins and Cuolter (2012)
In line with the above Moorhead (2007)
Another case according to Schermerhorn (2010)
In line with these definitions Mudlofir (2012)
Teacher competency can be interpreted that the teacher basically must have competence in him which is the overall knowledge, skills, expertise and basic values reflected in the habit of thinking and acting to carry out tasks in the field of education which includes teaching, guiding, educating, and evaluating student learning outcomes both academically and non-academically with full responsibility.
In line with the statement above according to Verderber in Mulyana (2011)
Responsibility is human awareness of intentional or unintentional behavior or actions. Responsibility/responsibility concerns the implementation of public organization activities in accordance with administrative principles that are correct or in accordance with organizational policies both explicitly and implicitly. The management objectives of a responsible organization are used to check whether service standards are correct, and how these standards are immediately implemented properly. Thus the responsibility is related to the implementation of an evaluation of the standard implementation of the activity whether the standards made are appropriate to the situation and conditions faced, and if it is deemed appropriate, then management has the responsibility to implement these standards.
Based on the study of various concepts, it can be synthesized that responsibility is to always carry out every task and obligation carried out seriously and correctly / correctly, with indicators (1) the obligation to carry out the assigned tasks or activities, (2) readiness to realize responsible behavior, (3) improving tasks and professions, (4) following applicable rules and procedures, and (5) developing the teaching profession.
Leadership is a topic that attracts many people and is defined in many ways. According to Elbaz and Haddoud (2017)
Leadership arises and develops as a result of automatic interactions between leaders and individuals led. According to Shane and Glinow (2010) that "leadership is closely related to how to influence, motivate, and allow other people to contribute to success organization". Leaders who have special skills so that they can influence the group they lead, to conduct joint ventures lead to the achievement of certain goals. Leadership is an ability to influence groups towards achieving goals.
According to Ivancevich, Konopaske and Matteson (2008)
A leader may have a variety or more than one power inherent in him, whose essence can be used to control quality or leadership according to his authority. According to Gibson
In line with the definition Colquitt
In line with the statement, Yukl (2001)
According to Player
Based on the explanation above, it can be synthesized that leadership is a process to influence subordinates as a form of legitimacy formally in achieving organizational goals, with indicators (1) directing, (2) motivating, (3) having work productivity, (4) influencing, (5) contribute to organizational success and (6) enforce rules.
The method in this study is a survey that will be analyzed using path analysis. The questionnaires used to obtain research data consisted of three variables
Inferential analysis uses path analysis. This research was conducted in North Jakarta State High School in the sample in this study amounted to 120 people. But before using path analysis, the analysis requirements test was carried out first, namely the normality test, significance test, and linearity. Whereas to calculate the path coefficient using the correlation coefficient of each causal relationship.
The results obtained after conducting a model analysis are used as a basis in answering hypotheses and drawing conclusions in this study. Explanation of the answers to these hypotheses can be described as follows:
The results of the analysis of the first hypothesis resulted in the finding that responsibility has a direct positive effect on performance. From the data of the calculation for the preparation of the regression equation model between the performance and responsibility in appendix 5, the regression constants a = 89.34 and the regression coefficient b = 0.31. Thus the relationship between the simple regression equation model is Ŷ = 89.34 + 0.31X1. Before the regression equation model is further analyzed and used to draw conclusions, first test the significance and linearity of the regression equation.
Regression equation Ŷ = 89.34 + 0.31X1, for the significance test obtained F count 24.71 greater than F table (0.05; 1: 118) 3.92 at α = 0.05. Because F count> F table, the regression equation is stated to be very significant. For the linearity test obtained F count of 0.98 smaller than F table (0.05; 29: 89) of 1.59 at α = 0.05. Because F count<Ftable, the distribution of estimated points forms a linear line can be accepted.
Based on these findings it can be concluded that performance is directly influenced positively by responsibility. Increasing responsibility will result in improved performance. The demands of a teacher's responsibility indicate the level of work completion and the quality of work results that lead to the creation of efficiency and effectiveness in completing work so that it can improve teacher performance. The results of these studies are in accordance with the statement of Goetsch and Davis (2010)
The results of the second hypothesis analysis yield findings that leadership has a direct positive effect on performance. From the calculation data for the preparation of the regression equation model between performance and leadership in appendix 5, the regression constants a = 92.72 and the regression coefficient b = 0.27. Thus the relationship of the simple regression equation model is Ŷ = 92.72 + 0.27 X2. Before the regression equation model is further analyzed and used to draw conclusions, first test the significance and linearity of the regression equation.
Regression equation Ŷ = 92.72 + 0.27X2, for the significance test obtained F count 23.81 greater than F table (0.05; 1: 118) 3.92 at α = 0.05. Because F count> F table, the regression equation is stated to be very significant. For the linearity test obtained F count of 1.42 smaller than F table (0.05; 32: 86) of 1.58 at α = 0.05. Because F count<F table, the distribution of estimated points forms a linear line can be accepted.
Based on these findings it can be concluded that performance is directly influenced positively by leadership. Increasing leadership will lead to increased performance. The results of this study are in line with the opinions of several experts including;
According to Schermerhorn (2010)
The results of the sixth hypothesis analysis provide findings that responsibility has a direct positive effect on leadership. The path coefficient value of responsibility for leadership is 0.208 with a calculated t value of 2.32. Because the coefficient of t count is greater than the value of t table at dk = 118 for α = 0.05 at 1.98, H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted, which means there is a positive direct effect of the responsibility variable on the leadership variable which is very significant.
Based on these findings it can be concluded that leadership is directly influenced positively by responsibility. Increasing responsibility will lead to increased leadership. The results of this study are in line with the opinion of Knights,
The indirect effect of responsibility for performance through leadership is the product of three path coefficients, namely: the path coefficient of responsibility to leadership (β21). The amount of indirect influence responsibility for performance through leadership is: (0.208) (0.243) = 0.013. So that the influence of total responsibility on performance is 0.294 through leadership.
Responsibility indirectly influences teacher performance through leadership. So that the ideal leadership is to have a sense of responsibility so that it can improve teacher performance. According to Knights,
This study is intended to look for factors that can influence the performance of teachers in North Jakarta State Senior High School including responsibility, and leadership. Based on the results of the statistical hypothesis test and discussion, the research produces the following:
Responsibility has a positive direct effect on the performance of teachers in North Jakarta State High School. This shows that if responsibility is carried out properly it will result in increased performance.
Leadership has a direct positive effect on performance teacher in North Jakarta State High School . This shows that if the leadership is run well it will result in increased performance.
Responsibility has a positive direct effect on leadership of teachers in North Jakarta State High School . This shows that if responsibility is carried out properly it will lead to increased leadership.
Responsibility has a positive indirect effect on the performance of teachers in North Jakarta State High School . It was concluded that leadership can mediate the effect of responsibility on performance. This is to be able to improve performance so responsibility to improve leadership before improving performance.
Based on the empirical findings obtained from this study, researchers presented several suggestions for the influence of responsibility, and leadership on teacher performance in North Jakarta Public High School, as follows.
The condition of responsibility should be improved because it proves to have a positive direct effect on the performance of teachers at North Jakarta State High School. The weakest aspect in responsibility is the obligation to carry out assigned tasks or activities , so that it needs to be improved.
The leadership condition should be improved because it is proven to have a positive direct effect on the teacher's performance in North Jakarta State High School . The weakest aspect in leadership is enforcing the rules, so it needs to be corrected.
The weakest aspect in the teacher's performance at North Jakarta Public High School is that the work is effective and efficient, so it needs to be improved.